Installation Video
Details From TriangleLab
Test introduction:
Compare the difference between the original hotend and OThotend printouts of the K1 printer
Test conditions:
printer:Creality K1
Filament:Creality hyper PLA
G-code: 600MM/S DEMO provide by Creality K1
Test introduction:
Compare the difference between the original hotend and OThotend printouts of the K1 printer
Test conditions:
printer:Creality K1
Filament:Creality hyper PLA
G-code: 600MM/S DEMO provide by Creality K1
Test Result:
As shown in the figure, after replacing the K1 printer with an OT hotend, the finished product printed at 600MM/S with the same Gcode file, the same filament, and the same nozzle is just as good, and the surface looks basically the same. But when we apply the same destructive force on the same place, the original hotend prints have layer separation, while the OT-hotend prints only show stress whitening. This indicate that the OT hotend has a higher flow rate in which the filament is more fully melted.
As shown in the figure, after replacing the K1 printer with an OT hotend, the finished product printed at 600MM/S with the same Gcode file, the same filament, and the same nozzle is just as good, and the surface looks basically the same. But when we apply the same destructive force on the same place, the original hotend prints have layer separation, while the OT-hotend prints only show stress whitening. This indicate that the OT hotend has a higher flow rate in which the filament is more fully melted.
drright71 (verified owner) –
Tested flow rate with Elegoo Black ASA up to 35mm^3/s before under extrusion began. This beats the 28mm^3/s I was getting with the Micro Swiss Flowtech with CM2. The only cons are the included nozzle is trash, and it uses MK8 nozzles rather than V6 (I picked up a CHT clone). I missed that little detail, which negated my idea of using a UHF upgrade. Still, this is the best you can get.